Podobne
- Strona startowa
- Frank Herbert Dune 5 Heretics of Dune
- Herbert Frank wiat Pandory 01 Epizod z Jezusem
- Herbert Frank Swiat Pandory 01 Epizod z Jezusem
- Herbert Frank Heretycy Diuny (SCAN dal 856)
- Herbert Frank Bog Imperator Diuny (2)
- Herbert Frank Bog Imperator Diuny
- The Lord Of The Rings (Collection)
- Kosinski Jerzy Gra (2)
- Blake, William Complete Poetry And Prose(1)
- Hunter Madeline Rothwell 01 Sztuka uwodzenia
- zanotowane.pl
- doc.pisz.pl
- pdf.pisz.pl
- ayno.opx.pl
Cytat
Do celu tam się wysiada. Lec Stanisław Jerzy (pierw. de Tusch-Letz, 1909-1966)
A bogowie grają w kości i nie pytają wcale czy chcesz przyłączyć się do gry (. . . ) Bogowie kpią sobie z twojego poukładanego życia (. . . ) nie przejmują się zbytnio ani naszymi planami na przyszłość ani oczekiwaniami. Gdzieś we wszechświecie rzucają kości i przypadkiem wypada twoja kolej. I odtąd zwyciężyć lub przegrać - to tylko kwestia szczęścia. Borys Pasternak
Idąc po kurzych jajach nie podskakuj. Przysłowie szkockie
I Herkules nie poradzi przeciwko wielu.
Dialog półinteligentów równa się monologowi ćwierćinteligenta. Stanisław Jerzy Lec (pierw. de Tusch - Letz, 1909-1966)
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.The first satellites,after several delays, are due for launch in 2006 07.67The SBIRS (High) system requires a European Ground Relay Station, essentially acommunications link.68 Following a UK/US agreement in March 1997, this is located atRAF Menwith Hill, also in Yorkshire, a National Security Agency signals intelligencesite.69 As this was well before NMD became an issue in Europe, it was probably regardedas uncontroversial, especially as SBIRS (High) simply replaces an existing capability.Unlike BMEWS and MIDAS there is no specific MoU governing SBIRS, its operationbeing covered by the very general 1951 NATO status of forces agreement and additionalconfidential arrangements.70 Like BMEWS,SBIRS was conceived separately from NMD, and is regarded as beingnecessary irrespective of whether or not the United States also decides toproceed with NMD deployment.It is being pursued as a separateproject& [But the] United States may& wish to make use of data relayedby SBIRS satellites via the European Ground Relay Station at RAFMenwith Hill for NMD purposes.71Though operated mainly by US personnel (unlike Fylingdales), the use of Menwith Hillfor NMD would also require British Government permission.The official positiontherefore remained the same as for Fylingdales: & the Government has received no suchrequest from the United States Administration nor would we expect to receive such arequest until and unless the United States Administration had decided to proceed with thedeployment of such a system.72 Britain and ballistic missile defence 1942 2002 198THE ABM TREATYThe relationship between Fylingdales, Menwith Hill and the ABM Treaty was not theonly interest the British Government and others had in the Treaty.Article I unequivocallyprohibits any ABM defence of national territory other than the national capital and anICBM field, as allowed under Article III (in 1974 amended to one or the other).From theoutset, therefore, it was evident to all concerned that any national missile defence wouldbe in breach of the ABM Treaty, requiring either its amendment to permit a thinnational defence, or withdrawal altogether as provided for in Article XV.73Britain was not a party to the Treaty, but was vitally affected by it.Its role inassuaging earlier concerns about US and Soviet ABM deployments, and therebymaintaining the credibility of the UK s own strategic deterrent, has already been noted.Aconsistent British view was that we continue to value the strategic stability that the treatyprovides.We want to see it preserved, 74 though just what constitutes strategic stabilityafter the end of Cold War bi-polarity has never been defined.It was always the intention of the Clinton Administration that any NMD deploymentwould only take place in the context of an agreed Treaty amendment, and the C1/C2 100interceptor configuration was designed to be as closely Treaty-compliant as possible.Britain welcomed the announcement in June 1999 of discussions between theAmericans and Russians on Treaty amendment and further offensive arms reductions(START III).75 The British Government, whatever its own concerns, always maintained: The question of any amendment to the anti-ballistic missile treaty to accommodate NMDis strictly a matter for the US and Russia, as parties to the treaty ;76 The anti-ballisticmissile treaty remains, in general terms, the foundation and basis of arms control ;77 but, As with any international treaty, the interpretation of the ABMT is a matter for theparties.It is not for nonparties, such as the United Kingdom, to offer their owninterpretations of its provisions. 78 Nonetheless, the government shared the view that athin NMD system within the context of amended ABM Treaty is unequivocallypreferable to unilateral withdrawal from the Treaty.79 That amendment had taken placebefore was noted, and Baroness Symons stated that a Treaty amended to allow NMDwould still be worth having.80Other politicians expressed themselves less attached to the Treaty
[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]